We may earn compensation from reviewed products. Learn about our editorial policies.
Apple's Studio Display XDR is a sight to behold, both in terms of the design and the actual display panel, but it should only really be considered by those who truly need it. For everyone else, save your pennies and get the normal one.
The Good
- Excellent colour reproduction
- Build quality is uber premium
- Thunderbolt 5 docks
- Easy height adjustment
The Not So Good
- Expensive
Need-to-knows
- XDR display is stunning, but only necessary for creative professionals
- Anti-reflective coating does make a difference
- Thunderbolt 5 ports are rapid
- Everyday users can safely buy the standard Studio Display
We finally have new Apple displays, and I’ve spent the last couple of weeks testing them.
There are two – the new Studio Display (an update of the original 2022 version), and a brand-new Studio Display XDR, which didn’t exist before and which kinda replaces the far more expensive Pro Display XDR (which has vanished from Apple’s website).
If you’re reading this web page, you have questions. What are the differences between these two new Apple displays? Which one is for you? Assuming you have the original 2022 Studio Display, which one should you upgrade to – if you should upgrade at all? Is it worth getting two of them? Do nits matter? Can you actually see ProMotion? What about LED versus mini-LED? What happened to those Kit Kats?
Shop the Studio Display XDR below!
At a glance
To kick things off and give you something to refer to, here’s a comparison table of Apple’s latest displays, which neatly demonstrates how they differ.
| Feature | Studio Display | Studio Display XDR |
| Starting Price | £1,499 / $1,599 | £2,999 / $3,299 |
| Chip | A19 (was A13) | A19 |
| Display Tech | Standard LED | Mini-LED (2304 zones) |
| Resolution | 5K (5120 x 2880) | 5K (5120 x 2880) |
| Pixel Density | 218 ppi | 218 ppi |
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 120Hz (ProMotion) |
| SDR Brightness | 600 nits | 1000 nits |
| HDR Brightness | N/A | 2000 nits (Peak) |
| Color Support | P3 Wide Color | P3 + Adobe RGB |
| Medical Mode | No | DICOM Presets Included |
| Charging (to Mac) | 96W | 140W (Fast Charge) |
| Included Stand | Tilt-only | Tilt + Height Adjustable |
| Camera / Audio | 12MP Center Stage / 6-Speakers | 12MP Center Stage / 6-Speakers |
| Ports (Back) | 2x Thunderbolt 5, 2x USB-C | 2x Thunderbolt 5, 2x USB-C |
| Daisy-Chaining | Up to 4 Studio Displays | Up to 2 XDR Displays |
Let’s dive into this in a bit more detail, shall we?
The new choice
If you want to buy an Apple monitor, you still have two choices, but Apple has labelled them both ‘Studio Display’. The difference is that one of them has ‘XDR’ at the end of its name, and there’s no mention of the word ‘Pro’ anymore, anywhere.
In the simplest terms possible, this means the Studio Display XDR is ‘the better one’.
On first glance, they look identical. They’re both 27-inch monitors with a 5K resolution and the same design (save for some extra vent holes on the top edge of the Studio Display XDR).
The standard Studio Display will be the default choice for Apple fans who want Apple everything and have zero interest in an inevitably ugly third-party monitor.
Related: M4 Mac mini review
The Studio Display XDR simply offers more technical bells and whistles.
The pricing neatly illustrates how differently each monitor is positioned. The Studio Display starts at £1,499/$1,599, while the Studio Display XDR jumps to £2,999/$3,299.
That’s a big price difference, eh? So, what does it all mean?
What they share
As noted, at face value, these are two very similar monitors. The 27-inch 5K retina displays have the same resolution and pixel density. They can both be configured with either standard glass or the nano-texture option.
They have the same beautiful design, too. The original Studio Display got some stick because of how expensive it was, but, as with all Apple gear, you’re paying partly for what remains the best industrial design out there. These are stunning monitors which, in my experience, really hold up to long-term use.
Both versions also have the new 12MP Centre Stage camera, which is a significant upgrade from the previous Studio Display’s camera, which was widely criticised for being of low quality. This one, finally, brings the Studio Display to where it should be in terms of camera quality.
Going old school: iPod Gen 5.5 review
They share the same speaker system. Consisting of six speakers in total, it is still the best computer monitor sound system I’ve ever heard, and will replace desktop speakers for a lot of people.
Oh, and they both have Thunderbolt 5 connectivity, too, which makes for faster data transfer and the ability to daisy-chain multiple Studio Displays. There’s a slight caveat there for the XDR, which I’ll get to later.
Studio Display: for the “Everyday Pro”
With all these similarities, I don’t blame you for thinking “ah, I’ll just grab the regular Studio Display”. And, for most people, that is absolutely the right choice.
If you’re running a business, freelancing operation, or simply investing time in a hobby which involves work with photos, video, or code, the standard Studio Display remains a superb choice. It’ll pair beautifully with your Mac in both functionality and aesthetics.
The 600 nits of peak brightness offered by the Studio Display is also perfect for most people. You don’t need anything brighter than that with non-HDR content, trust me. It also has P3 wide colour support and remains the sharpest 5K display I’ve seen (there aren’t many out there).
Two display better than one? Asus Zenbook Duo review
The fly in the ointment for some is that it only comes with a tilt stand; the height-adjustable version is an extra-cost upgrade. The refresh rate is also capped at 60Hz. Oh, and if you work regularly with HDR content, that 600 nits of peak brightness will be an issue.
Studio Display XDR: the upgrade
If anything within that last paragraph above bothers you, you’ll need to stump up more cash and opt for the Studio Display XDR instead.
Despite having an identical screen size, resolution, and pixel density, the Studio Display XDR swaps the regular model’s standard LED technology for mini-LED. This provides it with 2,304 LEDs and a massive 2,000 nits of peak brightness.
The result? Deeper blacks, less chance of blooming (the halos you sometimes see around bright subjects on a black screen), and perhaps most importantly for a lot of pros, consistency with the latest MacBook Pro displays, which share the same technology.
The Studio Display XDR also has a 120Hz ‘ProMotion’ refresh rate. That’s twice the refresh rate of the Studio Display and, once again, brings it in line with the latest MacBook Pro displays.
It’s also the first Apple monitor to have support for Adobe RGB colour, which is a must-have for anyone working in high-end print and design.
More: MacBook Neo review
There are a couple more things the Studio Display XDR has going for it. Firstly, the tilt-and-height-adjustable stand is included as standard. Secondly, it can deliver 140W of power to your MacBook, which is enough to fast-charge a 16-inch MacBook Pro (the Studio Display caps out at 96W).
Special note should also go to the DICOM Reference Modes. I have absolutely no idea what these are, but we’re told by Apple that they enable the Studio Display XDR to be used accurately in medical fields when reviewing X-rays and MRIs. At the time of writing (March 2026), this is undergoing FDA review, but assuming that all goes through ok, the Studio Display XDR is obviously the default choice out of the two for anyone who needs that level of accuracy.
Studio Display vs Studio Display XDR: how they compare
Watch non-HDR content side-by-side on both versions of the Studio Display, and it will look pretty much identical. It’s worth noting that the standard colour profiles are slightly different; the standard Studio Display appears to have a greenish tint, but there are lots of modes to choose from to get it to your liking, regardless.
The difference between the two panels becomes abundantly evident when you stick some HDR content on. In that realm, the Studio Display XDR literally shines much brighter; those 2,000 nits of peak brightness make themselves immediately known in the highlights. Blacks are also clearly a lot blacker, and the entire image just looks a cut above the regular Studio Display.
The same goes when viewing HDR photos and any kind of content that has a rich colour profile. It just looks better on the Studio Display XDR. As it should.
The regular Studio Display is no slouch, though. You have to remember that I’m comparing them side-by-side, which will, of course, make any differences between the two panels even more evident. The fact that my XDR review unit also has the nano-texture display option gives it yet another unfair advantage.
Let’s not forget the price difference here. You could get two regular Studio Displays for the price of a single Studio Display XDR.
Guide: MacBook Neo vs MacBook Air
Audio? It’s still the best you’ll find on a monitor, but the performance is identical on both versions of the Studio Display, because they share the same components in that regard.
Daisy chaining! There’s a difference here. It’s possible on both and means you can run one cable from your Mac to one Studio Display, and then link additional Studio Displays from the first Studio Display. The regular Studio Display can do this with up to four regular Studio Displays, while the Studio Display XDR is limited to two Studio Display XDRs in one daisy chain.
I really hope that last paragraph makes sense.
Should you upgrade from the original Studio Display?
If your 2022 Studio Display is performing just as well as the day you bought it, there’s absolutely no reason to stump up for the new, regular one. At most, you’re getting a better camera (you’ve probably resorted to something else for that already), slightly better speakers, and Thunderbolt 5 connectivity. The A19 chip is meaningless because the A13 chip in the original Studio Display was absolutely fine for that monitor.
However, if you want to add a second Studio Display to your existing setup, the new one will at least give you that additional screen estate and the aforementioned upgrades. Happy days.
If you need to upgrade your old Studio Display and get shot of it, I would save your pennies for as long as you need to buy the Studio Display XDR. That’s a big upgrade over the previous generation. Or, just buy one to sit alongside your old one. That’s what I’ll be doing.
Verdict: which should you buy?
Buy the standard Studio Display if you want a beautifully-made Apple-branded monitor that will last you an awfully long time and look utterly lovely every time you sit down at it (both aesthetically and in the visual quality department). For most people, it is the one to go for.
If you need ProMotion, full-on HDR performance, medical stuff compatibility, or anything else offered by the mini-LED Studio Display XDR, that’s the one to go for.
If you sit somewhere in the middle, I can’t tell you which one to go for. There’s a significant performance difference between the two of them, but only within the realm of video and photo editing. If you do either of those things professionally or as part of a passionate hobby and you have the budget, the Studio Display XDR is worth the money.
Let me know what you’re going for in the comments – and what you’d like me to cover next regarding these two displays. I feel like there’s still quite a bit to talk about.
4 Comments
Got the xdr arriving on Tuesday, I had refused delivery on one some weeks back due to not being certain of the quality for photos (Art is right on youtube settled my mind) So am looking forwards now 48 hours
poka
Totally agree—reliability matters more than looks. Same with vehicles: checking your Tecnomecánica 2026 status on RUNT helps avoid fines and surprises.
Really interesting comparison! The XDR version sounds impressive, especially with 120Hz ProMotion, mini-LED and higher brightness. But for everyday users, the standard Studio Display seems like Massar moutamadris the much better value. The Thunderbolt 5 upgrades are also a nice touch.